Friday September 3 2010
An Online Community for Digital Photographers

Advertise on The Light's Right

Pinpoint Control Over Noise Reduction
PinpointControlOverNoiseReduction.png

Most digital photographers apply noise reduction to the entire photograph using automatic settings. Tools like Nik Dfine, Neat Image, Noise Ninja, and Noiseware can do a better job than the built-in functionality for noise reduction in Photoshop. Applying noise reduction globally to the photograph invites a softer photo.

I've written a lot about using a surface mask with noise reduction. A surface mask can keep noise reduction away from the edges in a photograph and that can keep fine details sharper. You'll find free Photoshop scripts and action sets on this site for generating surface masks.

A surface mask is less global than applying noise reduction to the entire photograph, but you can still end up softening detail with a generic surface mask that could be protected with a narrower selection.

Noise is often most obvious in shadows and in sky gradients. If noise is limited to the sky or the shadows, why not restrict noise reduction to those photographic features?

Sky is relatively easy to mask. You can usually use the Color Range command in Photoshop. You use Sampled Colors as the selection. A few clicks will usually make an adequate selection if the Fuzziness setting is moderately high.

If you use Color Range to make a mask of the sky, you'll likely need to clean it up a bit. You'll want to soften the selection. I used Refine Edge with Photoshop CS4 for this example. With earlier versions of Photoshop, you can feather the selection or apply Gaussian Blur to the mask.

In the example here, the ocean also gets some selection. Once you save the selection as an alpha channel, you can grab the brush, set it to Black at 100%, and touch up the mask with just a few quick strokes.

The mask here will keep the noise reduction limited to just the sky. This will completely protect the important details for the pier and for the birds.

The sample below is a 200% zoom of the original photo (i.e., before noise reduction was applied). A small amount of noise is present in the sky gradient.

Here's the result after noise reduction was applied with Neat Image Pro+. The noise is reduced and the fine detail in the pelican is not softened. The mask did its job well.

When you use a surface mask that's more carefully targeted, you can use stronger noise reduction settings. This can mean a substantially better result with high ISO photos, where noise tends to be a more severe problem.

Carefully examine the pelican in both crops. You'll see that no detail whatsoever was lost for the pelican. The photo is ready for capture sharpening.

The TLR Professional Mask Toolkit script makes it easy to generate targeted surface masks for noise reduction. Not only can you choose to make a surface mask, you can make a surface mask that's restricted to sky colors or to the shadows. In this case, I chose to make a surface mask for midtone sky colors.

The mask is easily cleaned up with the Photoshop Posterize command. You could also use something like Levels (e.g., see the example below). A few selected areas in the water with midtone sky colors were easily cleaned up with the Brush tool set to Black. You could even use this mask without further refinement and get nearly identical results.

Shadows are another major photographic feature where noise tends to be more predominant. The TLR Professional Mask Toolkit script can quickly generate a surface mask that's restricted to the shadows.

Here's the result  . . .

You could use this mask "as is" and get good results. I cleaned it up with a simple Levels adjustment to the Gamma slider.

Again, here's a 200% zoom of the original photo. I typically shoot at 100 ISO. I'll do gymnastics to shoot anything but 100% ISO. There is noise evident in the shadows with this Canon D60 shot, however. Predominantly chromatic noise. Keeping chromatic noise reduction away from photographic detail is critical, since it tends to soften photos more than luminosity noise reduction.

 

For a small print, say 6" x 4", I'd leave the photo alone. For an enlargment, I'd apply some noise reduction. With the ability to target the noise reduction to the shadows and away from the important photographic detail, why not go ahead and apply noise reduction?

Applying pinpoint control to noise reduction is not especially difficult. The TLR Professional Mask Toolkit script makes the task easier. If you are not familiar with applying a mask to a layer, you should watch Using TLR Mask Tools. The only other skill you need is basic familiarity with adjustiing masks and selections.

Noise reduction is antagonistic to sharp photographic details. With high ISO images, you typically need to trade-off some residual noise or loss of fine detail. A targeted surface mask can save critical details in your photograph and allow you to be more aggressive with your noise reduction.

I hope you find this technique helpful with your digital photography. Cheers!

Click here to download a .PDF version of this tip . . .

Author information
Author Bio: 

Glenn Mitchell is an avid digital photographer, technical writer, and university administrator. He is an author with a long list of publications in trade magazines, peer-reviewed academic journals, and co-authored books. He is creative force behind The Light's Right. His photography can be seen at his gallery site: www.thelightsrightstudio.com.

Author: 
Glenn E. Mitchell II, Ph.D.
Rating: 
0
Average: 5 (3 votes)

Controlled noise reduction

Mitch
What a great post. Very helpful and clear description of how to improve noise reduction.
Thanks
Les
<p>Les</p>
<p>Website http://www.ncsparks.com/</p>

mitch's picture

Thanks. Waiting for Feedback!

Thanks, Les! I was waiting for someone to post some feedback about this topic. :)

"Tools like Nik Dfine, Neat

"Tools like Nik Dfine, Neat Image, Noise Ninja, and Noiseware can do a better job than the built-in functionality for noise reduction in Photoshop."

Do a better job than photoshop in what way? They remove more noise? Do it more quickly? Or they remove the same amount of noise but retain more detail from the non-noisy portions?

mitch's picture

Two Out Of Three

Two out three.

They can remove more noise and they can retain more detail. Generally, they take longer than Photoshop approaches, and that's because hte noise reduction plug-ins do very sophisticated image processing.

The traditional Photoshop approaches like going to L*a*b and blurring the *a and *b channels for chromatic noise or using Dust & Speckles or the Median filter for luminosity noise just do not compare with the sophistication of Photoshop plug-ins.

My noise reduction actions are quite sophisticated, as far as actions go. But they do not do the job as well as Photoshop plug-ins like Nik Dfine, Neat Image, Noise Ninja, or Noiseware.

Thanks Mitch! I have been

Thanks Mitch!

I have been using your "TLR Edge and Surface Masks" actions to great effect with your Landscape and your Portrait sharpening actions (thanks to your explanation that they generate an alpha channel selection rather than a separate layer)
How does the "TLR Edge and Surface Masks" differ from the TLR Professional Mask Tool kit profiled in this post?

mitch's picture

Re. Thanks Mitch! I have been

It's only one script. The script offers combinations not available with the actions.

The edge and surface masks use the same methodology. So they should provide (near) identical results whether you use the actions or the script.

The script offers tone-based masks and color-based masks. It also allows combinations, like surfaces with sky color or surfaces with shadow tones.

It would require dozens of actions to cover all the different combinations. The script has a UI that lets you select the combination you want from a few drop-down boxes.

THANKS Mitch....

...sounds like I'll be installing the script tonight. Sounds more user friendly for MY workstyle than the long list of mask actions. I found that when having to locate the desired action amongst a long list of similar actions that it was slowing me down, or worse, I'd absentmindedly select a surface mask rather than an edge mask.
Can't wait. Your tools are a time saver. Can't understand why there isn't more hype about them on sites like POTN.